Low-effort content produced with generative AI and posted at volume — synthetic images passed off as photographs, fabricated videos, and machine-written articles. It matters because it spreads faster than it can be checked, and because a synthetic image of a real event is the most common form of social-media misinformation.

How are items on this tracker classified?

Items are collected from public sources and classified automatically, with a confidence score and the specific detection signals recorded for each. Only items above a confidence threshold are listed. Automated classification can be wrong; the listed signals are there so a reader can judge for themselves rather than take the label on trust.

Does listing an item here mean it is proven fake?

No. This tracker records that content shows signals of being AI-generated and that it is circulating. It is not a verdict on any person, event, or claim. FAXTR surfaces evidence rather than issuing judgements.

How can I check an image myself?

Look for Content Credentials (C2PA) attached to the file, run a reverse image search to see whether the picture predates the event it is attributed to, and check whether established outlets report the same claim. FAXTR publishes step-by-step guides for each of these checks.

탐지 신호

✓Posted directly to r/midjourney subreddit (explicit AI generation community)
✓Typical Midjourney aesthetic with fantasy creature hybrid concept
✓Username and subreddit indicate intentional AI image generation
✓Preview image shows characteristic AI-generated creature rendering style

도달 범위

unknown

플랫폼

🔶reddit

AI 확신도

95%

분류: everyday

📊 탐지 방법론

각 항목은 Google 팩트체크 API, 11개 언어 출처 데이터베이스, 역방향 이미지 검색, 그리고 AI 탐지 신호(생성 흔적, 환각, 출처 검증)와 교차 대조됩니다. 확신도 점수는 이들 계층 전반의 합치 정도를 반영합니다.

AI 조작물 아카이브 더 보기 →

🎯 탐지 실력을 시험해 보세요

AI가 만든 헤드라인을 가려낼 수 있나요? 매일 진행되는 진짜일까 가짜일까? 퀴즈에 참여해 보세요 — 문항 5개, 점수 공유 가능.

오늘의 퀴즈 풀기 →

이 트래커가 살피는 것

설명을 위한 패턴 예시입니다 — 실제 추적 항목이 아니라 예시입니다. 위 목록이 실제로 수집·분류된 내용입니다.

예시
Fake disaster photos generated to fundraise scam donations
AI-generated images of recent natural disasters circulate with QR codes leading to scam donation pages. Reverse image search returns zero original sources — telltale of generative output.
신호: No reverse-image matches · Unrealistic crowd physics · Identical generative artifacts across 'different' photos
예시
Deepfake celebrity 'endorsements' for crypto schemes
Synthetic videos of well-known figures appearing to endorse new crypto tokens. Voice cloning + face swap on real interview footage. Most failures: blinking irregularity, lip-sync drift over 30s.
신호: Lip-sync drift after 30s · Inconsistent blinking rate · No matching real interview
예시
AI-generated 'news articles' mimicking real outlets
Articles styled to look like NYT/BBC publications with fabricated quotes and statistics. URL spoofs real domain with single character change. Output text shows GPT-typical phrasing patterns.
신호: Domain typosquatting · Hallucinated source citations · Statistical claims without primary source
예시
Fake science 'discoveries' with AI-generated lab photos
Posts claim breakthrough discoveries (free energy, cancer cure) paired with AI-rendered 'lab equipment' photos. Generative artifacts in glassware refraction and inconsistent text on signage.
신호: Glassware refraction errors · Garbled text on signage · Lab safety conventions violated

항목은 공개된 출처에서 수집되어 자동으로 분류됩니다. 등재는 해당 콘텐츠가 AI 생성 신호를 보이며 유통되고 있다는 사실을 기록한 것일 뿐, 특정 인물·사건·주장에 대한 판정이 아닙니다. 자동 분류는 틀릴 수 있으며, 직접 판단할 수 있도록 신호를 공개합니다.